[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1405459868-15089-78-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:29:07 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 077/198] block: virtio_blk: don't hold spin lock during world switch
3.13.11.5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
commit e8edca6f7f92234202d6dd163c118ef495244d7c upstream.
Firstly, it isn't necessary to hold lock of vblk->vq_lock
when notifying hypervisor about queued I/O.
Secondly, virtqueue_notify() will cause world switch and
it may take long time on some hypervisors(such as, qemu-arm),
so it isn't good to hold the lock and block other vCPUs.
On arm64 quad core VM(qemu-kvm), the patch can increase I/O
performance a lot with VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX enabled:
- without the patch: 14K IOPS
- with the patch: 34K IOPS
fio script:
[global]
direct=1
bsrange=4k-4k
timeout=10
numjobs=4
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=64
filename=/dev/vdc
group_reporting=1
[f1]
rw=randread
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 9b734f2..53e3db6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req)
unsigned int num;
const bool last = (req->cmd_flags & REQ_END) != 0;
int err;
+ bool notify = false;
BUG_ON(req->nr_phys_segments + 2 > vblk->sg_elems);
@@ -211,10 +212,12 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req)
return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_ERROR;
}
- if (last)
- virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq);
-
+ if (last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vblk->vq))
+ notify = true;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags);
+
+ if (notify)
+ virtqueue_notify(vblk->vq);
return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists