| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1405459868-15089-96-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:29:25 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 095/198] mm/memory-failure.c: don't let collect_procs() skip over processes for MF_ACTION_REQUIRED
3.13.11.5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
commit 74614de17db6fb472370c426d4f934d8d616edf2 upstream.
When Linux sees an "action optional" machine check (where h/w has reported
an error that is not in the current execution path) we generally do not
want to signal a process, since most processes do not have a SIGBUS
handler - we'd just prematurely terminate the process for a problem that
they might never actually see.
task_early_kill() decides whether to consider a process - and it checks
whether this specific process has been marked for early signals with
"prctl", or if the system administrator has requested early signals for
all processes using /proc/sys/vm/memory_failure_early_kill.
But for MF_ACTION_REQUIRED case we must not defer. The error is in the
execution path of the current thread so we must send the SIGBUS
immediatley.
Fix by passing a flag argument through collect_procs*() to
task_early_kill() so it knows whether we can defer or must take action.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 2b5da71..e5f7031 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -384,10 +384,12 @@ static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, int trapno,
}
}
-static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, int force_early)
{
if (!tsk->mm)
return 0;
+ if (force_early)
+ return 1;
if (tsk->flags & PF_MCE_PROCESS)
return !!(tsk->flags & PF_MCE_EARLY);
return sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
@@ -397,7 +399,7 @@ static int task_early_kill(struct task_struct *tsk)
* Collect processes when the error hit an anonymous page.
*/
static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
- struct to_kill **tkc)
+ struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -413,7 +415,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
for_each_process (tsk) {
struct anon_vma_chain *vmac;
- if (!task_early_kill(tsk))
+ if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
continue;
anon_vma_interval_tree_foreach(vmac, &av->rb_root,
pgoff, pgoff) {
@@ -432,7 +434,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
* Collect processes when the error hit a file mapped page.
*/
static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
- struct to_kill **tkc)
+ struct to_kill **tkc, int force_early)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -443,7 +445,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
for_each_process(tsk) {
pgoff_t pgoff = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (!task_early_kill(tsk))
+ if (!task_early_kill(tsk, force_early))
continue;
vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff,
@@ -469,7 +471,8 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
* First preallocate one tokill structure outside the spin locks,
* so that we can kill at least one process reasonably reliable.
*/
-static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill)
+static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill,
+ int force_early)
{
struct to_kill *tk;
@@ -480,9 +483,9 @@ static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill)
if (!tk)
return;
if (PageAnon(page))
- collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, &tk);
+ collect_procs_anon(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
else
- collect_procs_file(page, tokill, &tk);
+ collect_procs_file(page, tokill, &tk, force_early);
kfree(tk);
}
@@ -967,7 +970,7 @@ static int hwpoison_user_mappings(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn,
* there's nothing that can be done.
*/
if (kill)
- collect_procs(ppage, &tokill);
+ collect_procs(ppage, &tokill, flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED);
ret = try_to_unmap(ppage, ttu);
if (ret != SWAP_SUCCESS)
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists