[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C4B251.5000505@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:47:13 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, thp: only collapse hugepages to nodes with affinity
On 07/14/2014 06:09 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> + node = page_to_nid(page);
> + } else {
> + int distance = node_distance(page_to_nid(page), node);
> +
> + /*
> + * Do not migrate to memory that would not be reclaimed
> + * from.
> + */
> + if (distance > RECLAIM_DISTANCE)
> + goto out_unmap;
> + }
Isn't the reclaim behavior based on zone_reclaim_mode and not
RECLAIM_DISTANCE directly? And isn't that reclaim behavior disabled by
default?
I think you should at least be consulting zone_reclaim_mode.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists