| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20140715231715.139696543@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:18:02 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.15 65/84] ring-buffer: Check if buffer exists before polling
3.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
commit 8b8b36834d0fff67fc8668093f4312dd04dcf21d upstream.
The per_cpu buffers are created one per possible CPU. But these do
not mean that those CPUs are online, nor do they even exist.
With the addition of the ring buffer polling, it assumes that the
caller polls on an existing buffer. But this is not the case if
the user reads trace_pipe from a CPU that does not exist, and this
causes the kernel to crash.
Simple fix is to check the cpu against buffer bitmask against to see
if the buffer was allocated or not and return -ENODEV if it is
not.
More updates were done to pass the -ENODEV back up to userspace.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5393DB61.6060707@oracle.com
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/ring_buffer.h | 2 +-
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/trace/trace.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/trace/trace.h | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
+++ b/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ __ring_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size,
__ring_buffer_alloc((size), (flags), &__key); \
})
-void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu);
+int ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu);
int ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table);
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct ir
* as data is added to any of the @buffer's cpu buffers. Otherwise
* it will wait for data to be added to a specific cpu buffer.
*/
-void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
+int ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
{
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
@@ -557,6 +557,8 @@ void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer
if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS)
work = &buffer->irq_work;
else {
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
+ return -ENODEV;
cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
}
@@ -591,6 +593,7 @@ void ring_buffer_wait(struct ring_buffer
schedule();
finish_wait(&work->waiters, &wait);
+ return 0;
}
/**
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1103,13 +1103,13 @@ update_max_tr_single(struct trace_array
}
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE */
-static void default_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
+static int default_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
{
/* Iterators are static, they should be filled or empty */
if (trace_buffer_iter(iter, iter->cpu_file))
- return;
+ return 0;
- ring_buffer_wait(iter->trace_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
+ return ring_buffer_wait(iter->trace_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST
@@ -4236,17 +4236,19 @@ tracing_poll_pipe(struct file *filp, pol
*
* Anyway, this is really very primitive wakeup.
*/
-void poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
+int poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter)
{
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
/* sleep for 100 msecs, and try again. */
schedule_timeout(HZ / 10);
+ return 0;
}
/* Must be called with trace_types_lock mutex held. */
static int tracing_wait_pipe(struct file *filp)
{
struct trace_iterator *iter = filp->private_data;
+ int ret;
while (trace_empty(iter)) {
@@ -4256,10 +4258,13 @@ static int tracing_wait_pipe(struct file
mutex_unlock(&iter->mutex);
- iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
+ ret = iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
mutex_lock(&iter->mutex);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (signal_pending(current))
return -EINTR;
@@ -5196,8 +5201,12 @@ tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp,
goto out_unlock;
}
mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
- iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
+ ret = iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
+ if (ret) {
+ size = ret;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
if (signal_pending(current)) {
size = -EINTR;
goto out_unlock;
@@ -5407,8 +5416,10 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file
goto out;
}
mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
- iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
+ ret = iter->trace->wait_pipe(iter);
mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
if (signal_pending(current)) {
ret = -EINTR;
goto out;
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ struct tracer {
void (*stop)(struct trace_array *tr);
void (*open)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
void (*pipe_open)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
- void (*wait_pipe)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
+ int (*wait_pipe)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
void (*close)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
void (*pipe_close)(struct trace_iterator *iter);
ssize_t (*read)(struct trace_iterator *iter,
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ void trace_init_global_iter(struct trace
void tracing_iter_reset(struct trace_iterator *iter, int cpu);
-void poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter);
+int poll_wait_pipe(struct trace_iterator *iter);
void tracing_sched_switch_trace(struct trace_array *tr,
struct task_struct *prev,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists