linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 24/66] ACPI / EC: Fix race condition in ec_transaction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140715231703.091815733@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:17:18 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Barton Xu <tank.xuhan@...il.com>,
	Steffen Weber <steffen.weber@...il.com>,
	Arthur Chen <axchen@...dia.com>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 24/66] ACPI / EC: Fix race condition in ec_transaction_completed()

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>

commit c0d653412fc8450370167a3268b78fc772ff9c87 upstream.

There is a race condition in ec_transaction_completed().

When ec_transaction_completed() is called in the GPE handler, it could
return true because of (ec->curr == NULL). Then the wake_up() invocation
could complete the next command unexpectedly since there is no lock between
the 2 invocations. With the previous cleanup, the IBF=0 waiter race need
not be handled any more. It's now safe to return a flag from
advance_condition() to indicate the requirement of wakeup, the flag is
returned from a locked context.

The ec_transaction_completed() is now only invoked by the ec_poll() where
the ec->curr is ensured to be different from NULL.

After cleaning up, the EVT_SCI=1 check should be moved out of the wakeup
condition so that an EVT_SCI raised with (ec->curr == NULL) can trigger a
QR_SC command.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70891
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63931
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59911
Reported-and-tested-by: Gareth Williams <gareth@...ethwilliams.me.uk>
Reported-and-tested-by: Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@...oraproject.org>
Reported-by: Barton Xu <tank.xuhan@...il.com>
Tested-by: Steffen Weber <steffen.weber@...il.com>
Tested-by: Arthur Chen <axchen@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/ec.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -158,16 +158,17 @@ static int ec_transaction_completed(stru
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
-	if (!ec->curr || (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE))
+	if (ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE))
 		ret = 1;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
 	struct transaction *t;
 	u8 status;
+	bool wakeup = false;
 
 	pr_debug("===== %s =====\n", in_interrupt() ? "IRQ" : "TASK");
 	status = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
@@ -183,21 +184,25 @@ static void advance_transaction(struct a
 		} else if (t->rlen > t->ri) {
 			if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF) == 1) {
 				t->rdata[t->ri++] = acpi_ec_read_data(ec);
-				if (t->rlen == t->ri)
+				if (t->rlen == t->ri) {
 					t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE;
+					wakeup = true;
+				}
 			} else
 				goto err;
 		} else if (t->wlen == t->wi &&
-			   (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0)
+			   (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0) {
 			t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE;
-		return;
+			wakeup = true;
+		}
+		return wakeup;
 	} else {
 		if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0) {
 			acpi_ec_write_cmd(ec, t->command);
 			t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL;
 		} else
 			goto err;
-		return;
+		return wakeup;
 	}
 err:
 	/*
@@ -208,13 +213,14 @@ err:
 		if (in_interrupt() && t)
 			++t->irq_count;
 	}
+	return wakeup;
 }
 
 static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
 	ec->curr->irq_count = ec->curr->wi = ec->curr->ri = 0;
 	ec->curr->flags = 0;
-	advance_transaction(ec);
+	(void)advance_transaction(ec);
 }
 
 static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data);
@@ -248,7 +254,7 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 					return 0;
 			}
 			spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
-			advance_transaction(ec);
+			(void)advance_transaction(ec);
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 		} while (time_before(jiffies, delay));
 		pr_debug("controller reset, restart transaction\n");
@@ -627,12 +633,10 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(acpi_hand
 	struct acpi_ec *ec = data;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
-	advance_transaction(ec);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
-	if (ec_transaction_completed(ec)) {
+	if (advance_transaction(ec))
 		wake_up(&ec->wait);
-		ec_check_sci(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec));
-	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
+	ec_check_sci(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec));
 	return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED | ACPI_REENABLE_GPE;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/