[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140715111237.GF7668@distanz.ch>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:12:37 +0200
From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
lftan.linux@...il.com, cltang@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 24/29] nios2: Module support
On 2014-07-15 at 12:24:46 +0200, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2014 16:45:51 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > +void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
> > +{
> > + if (size == 0)
> > + return NULL;
> > + return kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Free memory returned from module_alloc */
> > +void module_free(struct module *mod, void *module_region)
> > +{
> > + kfree(module_region);
> > +}
>
> Any particular reason for defining these to use kmalloc rather than
> the default vmalloc based functions?
AFAIR this is due to relocation issues, as the FIXME comment in the
"original" code [1] states. I don't know whether this still applies,
though (or what would be the proper fix for this to overcome the
relocation issues).
[1] https://github.com/tklauser/linux-nios2/blob/nios2/arch/nios2/kernel/module.c#L45
Cheers
Tobias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists