linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/4] timerfd c/r support, v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1407152319590.24854@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] timerfd c/r support, v4



On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:16:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > 
> > > Maybe it's because of new -rc? Letme check...
> > 
> > No, it's because its against an older version of your patches which
> > lack the #ifdef PROC_FS around the show function ....
> 
> Crap. Sorry. Thomas, I'm fetching -rc5 now, I suppose better will
> be if I rebase the whole series and resend. Sounds good?

No rebase necessary. 1&2 apply fine. It's home made wreckage :)
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/