[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1405546565.23419.3.camel@linux-fkkt.site>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:36:05 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Patrik Fimml <patrikf@...omium.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...gle.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Power-managing devices that are not of interest at some point
in time
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:08 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > I am not so much concerned about userspace, but about reusing of as
> > much of existing PM framework in the drivers. Right now it is very
> > hard to correctly track dependencies between general open/close,
> > system suspend/resume, and various runtime-PM transitions. Adding
> yet
> > another PM mechanism into the mix will just add more complexity.
>
> Would it make sense to unbind the drivers for these devices when the
> lid is closed? With the drivers gone, there would naturally be no
No, because I don't want settings of my devices to disappear.
You can do that only for stateless devices. And I doubt you can
tell in general which devices are stateless.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists