[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C6F271.6070707@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:45:21 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
"Srivatsa S . Bhat" <srivatsa@....edu>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on
hotplug/suspend
On 07/16/2014 01:25 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On 07/16/2014 01:24 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 16 July 2014 04:17, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>>
>>> @@ -1110,9 +1092,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
>>> *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>> /* check whether a different CPU already registered this
>>> - * CPU because it is in the same boat. */
>>> + * CPU because it is one of the related CPUs. */
>>> policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>>> - if (unlikely(policy)) {
>>> + if (policy) {
>>> + cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(policy, cpu, true);
>>
>> This is just a waste of time at boot as ... (see below)
>
> Why? Please explain.
>
Nevermind. Figured what you meant. I just need to improve the "if" check.
-Saravana
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists