linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: emxx_udc: Fix coding style errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140716025545.GA27842@stone-arch>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:55:45 +0800
From:	Stone Kang <stonekyx@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
	Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: emxx_udc: Fix coding style errors

Hi Greg,

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:21:28PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:16:15AM +0800, Stone Kang wrote:
> > Only fixing errors reported by checkpatch.pl, based on the following
> > rules:
> > 1. '*' should be adjacent to the data name or function name.
> > 2. Don't use C99-style "// ..." comments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: KANG Yuxuan <stonekyx@...il.com>
> 
> I see two different names here, one in the "From:" line, and one in the
> Signed-off-by: line, are they the same?  They need to match up :(
> 
> Please resend with this fixed.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Sorry, I forgot to set the From: line.

New patch has been sent, but as the content didn't change, no 'v2' tag
was attached in the title.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/