linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/ubifs/super.c: replace count*size kzalloc by kcalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1405491443.1829.22.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:17:23 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/ubifs/super.c: replace count*size kzalloc by
 kcalloc

On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 09:10 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 18:41 +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > kcalloc manages count*sizeof overflow.
> > 
> > Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
> > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> > Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
> > Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
> 
> In the commit message, please, try to not only tell _what_ you do,
> but also _why_ you do this. And ideally, but not necessary for this
> case, I think, how this was tested (e.g., compile-tested only).

Oh, I'm sorry, you did tell "why" in this patch, I was looking an the a
different patch of yours (seq_printf). I've applied this patch to
linux-ubifs.git, thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/