[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C5C1C9.6070100@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:05:29 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
plagnioj@...osoft.com, tomi.valkeinen@...com,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/11] x86, mm, pat: Change reserve_memtype() to handle
WT type
On 07/15/2014 04:53 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> Right.
>
> I think using struct page table for the RAM ranges is a good way for
> saving memory, but I wonder how often the RAM ranges are mapped other
> than WB... If not often, reserve_memtype() could simply call
> rbt_memtype_check_insert() for all ranges, including RAM.
>
> In this patch, I left using reserve_ram_pages_type() since I do not see
> much reason to use WT for RAM, either.
>
They get flipped to WC or WT or even UC for some I/O devices, but
ultimately the number of ranges is pretty small.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists