linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] usb: chipidea: add a usb2 driver for ci13xxx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5615007.cNNjmu3rBK@wuerfel>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:14:02 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Antoine Ténart 
	<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, Peter.Chen@...escale.com,
	balbi@...com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
	jszhang@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] usb: chipidea: add a usb2 driver for ci13xxx

On Wednesday 16 July 2014 11:15:33 Antoine Ténart wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:41:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 July 2014 10:26:01 Antoine Ténart wrote:
> > > +
> > > +       if (priv->dma_mask) {
> > > +               ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, priv->dma_mask);
> > > +               if (ret)
> > > +                       return ret;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > 
> > 
> > As mentioned in my comment for the binding, this is the wrong way to do it.
> > Russell has in the past converted all drivers that did this manually to 
> > do dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() so we can spot them more easily, but we
> > should really be doing this better for new drivers.
> > 
> > Can you describe what the restriction is that you want to put on the dma mask?
> 
> Some people wanted the possibility to set the DMA mask as this USB2 CI
> driver does not do specific Berlin operation and can be reused later.
> I don't particularly need to call dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() in my
> case, as far as I know.

Ok, just remove the call then and rely on the default mask.
 
> They can maybe give the restrictions they might want to put on the DMA
> mask.

If the restriction is from the bus, it should get handled automatically
by the device probe as long as the correct dma-ranges property is there
(though we have a small bug there at the moment). If there is a variation
of ci13xxx that can't do 32-bit DMA, that should use a different compatible
string and pass a fixed mask into dma_set_mask_and_coherent() based on
the device.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/