linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: exynos4: hotplug: Fix CPU idle clock down after CPU off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <53C678B5.7080304@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:05:57 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: exynos4: hotplug: Fix CPU idle clock down after
 CPU off

Hi Krzysztof,

On 16.07.2014 14:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[snip]

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +extern void exynos_clear_delayed_reset_assertion(u32 core_id);
> +#endif

Is the ifdef really needed? The only difference it makes if the function
is used but not compiled in is that with it the compilation will fail,
while without it the kernel won't link.

> +
>  extern void exynos_cpu_resume(void);
>  
>  extern struct smp_operations exynos_smp_ops;

[snip]

> +/*
> + * Clear the USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION option, set on Exynos4 SoCs
> + * during hot-unplugging CPUx.
> + *
> + * It won't harm if this is called during first boot of secondary CPU.
> + *
> + * Exynos4 SoCs require setting USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION so the CPU idle
> + * clock down feature could properly detect global idle state when
> + * CPUx is off.
> + */
> +void exynos_clear_delayed_reset_assertion(u32 core_id)
> +{
> +	if (soc_is_exynos4()) {
> +		unsigned int tmp;
> +
> +		tmp = __raw_readl(EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_OPTION(core_id));
> +		tmp &= ~(S5P_USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION);
> +		__raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_OPTION(core_id));
> +	}
> +}

The idea to make this a helper function is quite nice, but maybe it
could be extended into exynos_set_delayed_reset_assertion() and disable
or enable delayed assertion depending on another argument?

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/