lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:29:18 -0400 From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com CC: josh@...htriplett.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, "open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Remove stale comment in tree.c On 07/16/2014 08:47 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:57:59PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: >> >> On 07/15/2014 06:53 PM, josh@...htriplett.org wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:31:48PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: >>>> This commit removes a stale comment in rcu/tree.c. >>>> FYI, an updated comment exists a few lines below this. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com> >>> In general, when removing a stale comment, I'd suggest explaining why >>> the comment is stale. Was code removed without removing the >>> corresponding comment, or was code changed such that the comment no >>> longer applies, or...? >> >> I guess it was left out when code was moved around previously. And I did mention that an updated comment is there a few lines below. >> >> For reference this is the new comment which is below the old comment, they mean the same :) >> >> /* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ > > Indeed that is the case. > > Please update the commit log with this explanation and resend. > > Thanx, Paul > Please find the updated patch below. -- Pranith From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:01:05 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Remove stale comment in tree.c This commit removes a stale comment in rcu/tree.c which was left out when some code was moved around previously. For reference, the following updated comment exists a few lines below this which means the same. /* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com> --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index a1abaa8..e67246e 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2211,8 +2211,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) /* Adjust any no-longer-needed kthreads. */ rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1); - /* Remove the dead CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ - /* Exclude any attempts to start a new grace period. */ mutex_lock(&rsp->onoff_mutex); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->orphan_lock, flags); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists