[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1405518503-27687-5-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:48:12 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 04/15] mm, compaction: do not recheck suitable_migration_target under lock
isolate_freepages_block() rechecks if the pageblock is suitable to be a target
for migration after it has taken the zone->lock. However, the check has been
optimized to occur only once per pageblock, and compact_checklock_irqsave()
might be dropping and reacquiring lock, which means somebody else might have
changed the pageblock's migratetype meanwhile.
Furthermore, nothing prevents the migratetype to change right after
isolate_freepages_block() has finished isolating. Given how imperfect this is,
it's simpler to just rely on the check done in isolate_freepages() without
lock, and not pretend that the recheck under lock guarantees anything. It is
just a heuristic after all.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
mm/compaction.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index f3ae2ec..0a871e5 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
struct page *cursor, *valid_page = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
bool locked = false;
- bool checked_pageblock = false;
cursor = pfn_to_page(blockpfn);
@@ -307,18 +306,6 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
if (!locked)
break;
- /* Recheck this is a suitable migration target under lock */
- if (!strict && !checked_pageblock) {
- /*
- * We need to check suitability of pageblock only once
- * and this isolate_freepages_block() is called with
- * pageblock range, so just check once is sufficient.
- */
- checked_pageblock = true;
- if (!suitable_migration_target(page))
- break;
- }
-
/* Recheck this is a buddy page under lock */
if (!PageBuddy(page))
goto isolate_fail;
--
1.8.4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists