[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1405519254.31919.24.camel@iivanov-dev>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:00:54 +0300
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
pramod.gurav.etc@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Kconfig: Select SPMI when REGMAP_SPMI is
selected
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 06:26:15PM +0530, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>
> Fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, this will make your
> mails more legible - see Documentation/email-clients.txt.
>
> > On Wednesday, 16 July, 2014 5:55pm, "Stanimir Varbanov" <svarbanov@...sol.com> said:
>
> > The CONFIG_SPMI option is visible in menuconfig hence either it should
> > be set by default in multi_v7_defconfig(like in qcom_defconfig) or
> > driver owner should mention a 'depneds on CONFIG_SPMI' as suggested by
> > Lars-Peter Clausen.
>
> > I prefer the former (defconfig).
>
> No, this isn't an either/or thing - the dependency is absolutely
> mandatory if the device needs SPMI. The defconfigs are a separate
> thing, they just exist to give people a starting point for configuring
> their kernel so if the device using SPMI is important for relevant
> systems the defconfig needs to be set up to enable it but that's
> separate to the dependency since there's no need for people to ever even
> look at defconfigs.
Then config REGMAP_SPMI should depend on SPMI, right?
Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists