linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/19] serial: samsung: Remove support for legacy clock code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1405521324.4408.44.camel@x220>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:35:24 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/19] serial: samsung: Remove support for legacy clock
 code

On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:26 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > That's right. Apparently I missed them. I guess that's not critical,
> > though, and could be done in separate patch, right?
> 
> This is not critical at all, so that's fine with me. 

Actually, that's only correct if the solution here is to just remove the
(currently) dead code hidden behind CONFIG_SAMSUNG_CLOCK. But if the
solution requires something less trivial, that might be quite wrong.

So please disregard my comment!


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/