linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 3.10.47-rt50-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:22:27 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 3.10.47-rt50-rc1

On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:31:17 -0500
Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com> wrote:

 
> I originally did a patch that just always did the else clause (the
> schedule_work_on() and wait_for_completion()) on all CPUs.  That seemed
> to work just fine and simplifies the code a bit and gets rid of all the
> preempt/migrate calls.  You could try that approach, or I could submit
> something if you liked.

Yeah, perhaps that's the way to go. But it needs to go to mainline
before it goes to -rt.

Can you resend it against my for-next branch.

Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/