[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140716112227.7b8bc4bf@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:22:27 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/3] Linux 3.10.47-rt50-rc1
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:31:17 -0500
Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com> wrote:
> I originally did a patch that just always did the else clause (the
> schedule_work_on() and wait_for_completion()) on all CPUs. That seemed
> to work just fine and simplifies the code a bit and gets rid of all the
> preempt/migrate calls. You could try that approach, or I could submit
> something if you liked.
Yeah, perhaps that's the way to go. But it needs to go to mainline
before it goes to -rt.
Can you resend it against my for-next branch.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists