[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C69BCF.8030307@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:35:43 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: kyungmin.park@...sung.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 02/21] leds: implement sysfs interface locking
mechanism
Hi Jacek,
Thank you for the update!
Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
...
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
> index 71b40d3..4d7cb31 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c
> @@ -126,3 +126,21 @@ void led_set_brightness(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> __led_set_brightness(led_cdev, brightness);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(led_set_brightness);
> +
> +/* Caller must ensure led_cdev->led_lock held */
> +void led_sysfs_lock(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&led_cdev->led_lock));
How about lockdep_assert_held() instead?
--
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@....fi XMPP: sailus@...iisi.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists