[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C6AAE1.7090802@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:40:01 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: balbi@...com
CC: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] tty: serial: 8250 core: add runtime pm
On 07/16/2014 06:06 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> well, other than in probe and other functions which need to
>>> make sure clocks are on, but it seems unnecessary to
>>> enable/disable in every function.
>>
>> What do you have in mind? Do you plan to let the uart on while
>> the minicom is attached but is doing nothing? In that case,
>> ->startup() and ->shutdown() should be enough.
>
> no the idea was to keep it on for as long as it's transferring
> characters and idle it otherwise, if that can't be done easily,
> then I guess your way is the only way.
But maybe we have to add some additional logic here to keep it up for
the transfer. I've been just (maybe over)thinking: If you send 300
bytes over DMA via 300 baud it should take 10 seconds. The PM-timeout
could hit before the transfer is complete.
Same thing with hw-flowcontrol where you could get stalled for a few
seconds.
However it doesn't seem to be a problem in current omap-serial driver.
> cheers
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists