[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140716164141.GA3016@saruman.home>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:41:42 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: <balbi@...com>, <will.deacon@....com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Function Profiler broken on today's linux-next
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:29:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:23:28 -0500
> Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I was trying to use Kernel Function Profiler to figure out why my
> > driver's IRQ handler is taking so much CPU time but to my surprise,
> > whenever I try to trace anything, I get a "Unable to handle kernel
> > paging request at virtual address XXXX" error.
> >
> > Is anybody else seen that or did I screw up my Kernel config ?
>
> No, it's probably my fault. The ftrace infrastructure is going through
> an overhaul and some dramatic changes are happening. Although it has
> passed all my tests, I can't cover everyone's configs and use cases.
>
> Please send me your config and the steps you did to enable function
> profiling. This is x86 correct? Other archs are already known to be
> broken and I'm working on fixing them now.
.config attached. It's actually an ARM platform, I can help out with
testing anything you need.
cheers
--
balbi
View attachment ".config" of type "text/plain" (92494 bytes)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists