[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+r-CpJiXipCT=j09+ZfJjF9jTc3kuZFAH3ZxgUEvktTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:54:38 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...omium.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/11] seccomp: add thread sync ability
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/10, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This adds the ability for threads to request seccomp filter
>>>> synchronization across their thread group (at filter attach time).
>>>> For example, for Chrome to make sure graphic driver threads are fully
>>>> confined after seccomp filters have been attached.
>>>>
>>>> To support this, locking on seccomp changes via thread-group-shared
>>>> sighand lock is introduced, along with refactoring of no_new_privs. Races
>>>> with thread creation are handled via delayed duplication of the seccomp
>>>> task struct field and cred_guard_mutex.
>>>>
>>>> This includes a new syscall (instead of adding a new prctl option),
>>>> as suggested by Andy Lutomirski and Michael Kerrisk.
>>>
>>> I do not not see any problems in this version,
>>
>> Awesome! Thank you for all the reviews. :) If Andy and Michael are
>> happy with this too, I think this is in good shape. \o/
>
> I think I'm happy with it. Is it in git somewhere for easy perusal?
> I have a cold, so my reviewing ability is a bit off, but I want to
> take a look at the final version, and git is a little easier than
> email for this.
Hi Andy,
Have you had a chance to look v10 over? I'd like to send a v11 with
Oleg's Reviewed-by added (at James Morris's request). Should I add one
from you as well?
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists