lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:22:04 +0000
From:	Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>
To:	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
	"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
CC:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	"andrzej.p@...sung.com" <andrzej.p@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 10/12] usb: dwc2/gadget: assign TX FIFO dynamically

> With a TX FIFO size of 3072, an entire microframe worth of Isoc data
> (when MaxBurst=2) can fit in the FIFO. I guess that is why you chose

s/MaxBurst/Mult/ i.e. bits 12..11 of wMaxPacketSize.

-- 
Paul

> From: linux-usb-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-usb-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Zimmerman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 12:58 PM
> 
> > From: Robert Baldyga [mailto:r.baldyga@...sung.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 3:22 AM
> >
> > Because we have not enough memory to have each TX FIFO of size at least 3072
> > bytes (the maximum single packet size), we create four FIFOs of lenght 1024,
> > and four of length 3072 bytes, and assing them to endpoints dynamically
> > according to maxpacket size value of given endpoint.
> 
> I don't think this commit message entirely explains what you are doing
> here.
> 
> 3072 is actually 3 times the max packet size for an Isoc endpoint. So you
> want to have four TX FIFOs of that size, presumably to be assigned to
> Isoc endpoints. Where before this change, all TX FIFOs were of size 768,
> which is not even 1 max packet size for an Isoc endpoint. So I guess you
> were seeing some problem with that?
> 
> With a TX FIFO size of 3072, an entire microframe worth of Isoc data
> (when MaxBurst=2) can fit in the FIFO. I guess that is why you chose
> 3072?
> 
> Also, after this change, you are only initializing 8 TX FIFOs, where
> before you were initializing all 15. So now there can only be a maximum
> of 8 IN endpoints active at the same time. That's OK I guess, but I
> think you should mention that in the commit message.
> 
> --
> Paul
> 
> > It needed to do some small modifications in few places in code, because there
> > was assumption that TX FIFO numbers assigned to endpoints are the same as
> > the endpoint numbers, which is not true since we have dynamic FIFO assigning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h   |  2 ++
> >  drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> > index 067390e..3b4bd4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> > @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct s3c_hsotg_ep {
> >  	unsigned int            last_load;
> >  	unsigned int            fifo_load;
> >  	unsigned short          fifo_size;
> > +	unsigned short		fifo_index;
> >
> >  	unsigned char           dir_in;
> >  	unsigned char           index;
> > @@ -197,6 +198,7 @@ struct s3c_hsotg {
> >  	int			fifo_mem;
> >  	unsigned int            dedicated_fifos:1;
> >  	unsigned char           num_of_eps;
> > +	u32			fifo_map;
> >
> >  	struct dentry           *debug_root;
> >  	struct dentry           *debug_file;
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c
> > index 3435711..1b5e9ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c
> > @@ -184,14 +184,29 @@ static void s3c_hsotg_init_fifo(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg)
> >
> >  	/* start at the end of the GNPTXFSIZ, rounded up */
> >  	addr = 2048 + 1024;
> > -	size = 768;
> >
> >  	/*
> > -	 * currently we allocate TX FIFOs for all possible endpoints,
> > -	 * and assume that they are all the same size.
> > +	 * Because we have not enough memory to have each TX FIFO of size at
> > +	 * least 3072 bytes (the maximum single packet size), we create four
> > +	 * FIFOs of lenght 1024, and four of length 3072 bytes, and assing
> > +	 * them to endpoints dynamically according to maxpacket size value of
> > +	 * given endpoint.
> >  	 */
> >
> > -	for (ep = 1; ep <= 15; ep++) {
> > +	/* 256*4=1024 bytes FIFO length */
> > +	size = 256;
> > +	for (ep = 1; ep <= 4; ep++) {
> > +		val = addr;
> > +		val |= size << FIFOSIZE_DEPTH_SHIFT;
> > +		WARN_ONCE(addr + size > hsotg->fifo_mem,
> > +			  "insufficient fifo memory");
> > +		addr += size;
> > +
> > +		writel(val, hsotg->regs + DPTXFSIZN(ep));
> > +	}
> > +	/* 768*4=3072 bytes FIFO length */
> > +	size = 768;
> > +	for (ep = 5; ep <= 8; ep++) {
> >  		val = addr;
> >  		val |= size << FIFOSIZE_DEPTH_SHIFT;
> >  		WARN_ONCE(addr + size > hsotg->fifo_mem,
> > @@ -450,7 +465,7 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_write_fifo(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg,
> >  	to_write = DIV_ROUND_UP(to_write, 4);
> >  	data = hs_req->req.buf + buf_pos;
> >
> > -	iowrite32_rep(hsotg->regs + EPFIFO(hs_ep->index), data, to_write);
> > +	iowrite32_rep(hsotg->regs + EPFIFO(hs_ep->fifo_index), data, to_write);
> >
> >  	return (to_write >= can_write) ? -ENOSPC : 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -1281,7 +1296,7 @@ static void s3c_hsotg_rx_data(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg, int ep_idx, int size)
> >  {
> >  	struct s3c_hsotg_ep *hs_ep = &hsotg->eps[ep_idx];
> >  	struct s3c_hsotg_req *hs_req = hs_ep->req;
> > -	void __iomem *fifo = hsotg->regs + EPFIFO(ep_idx);
> > +	void __iomem *fifo = hsotg->regs + EPFIFO(hs_ep->fifo_index);
> >  	int to_read;
> >  	int max_req;
> >  	int read_ptr;
> > @@ -1835,7 +1850,7 @@ static void s3c_hsotg_epint(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg, unsigned int idx,
> >  		if (dir_in) {
> >  			int epctl = readl(hsotg->regs + epctl_reg);
> >
> > -			s3c_hsotg_txfifo_flush(hsotg, idx);
> > +			s3c_hsotg_txfifo_flush(hsotg, hs_ep->fifo_index);
> >
> >  			if ((epctl & DXEPCTL_STALL) &&
> >  				(epctl & DXEPCTL_EPTYPE_BULK)) {
> > @@ -1984,6 +1999,7 @@ static void kill_all_requests(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg,
> >  			      int result, bool force)
> >  {
> >  	struct s3c_hsotg_req *req, *treq;
> > +	unsigned size;
> >
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, treq, &ep->queue, queue) {
> >  		/*
> > @@ -1997,9 +2013,11 @@ static void kill_all_requests(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg,
> >  		s3c_hsotg_complete_request(hsotg, ep, req,
> >  					   result);
> >  	}
> > -	if(hsotg->dedicated_fifos)
> > -		if ((readl(hsotg->regs + DTXFSTS(ep->index)) & 0xffff) * 4 < 3072)
> > -			s3c_hsotg_txfifo_flush(hsotg, ep->index);
> > +	if (hsotg->dedicated_fifos) {
> > +		size = (readl(hsotg->regs + DTXFSTS(ep->index)) & 0xffff) * 4;
> > +		if (size < ep->fifo_size)
> > +			s3c_hsotg_txfifo_flush(hsotg, ep->fifo_index);
> > +	}
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -2440,6 +2458,7 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_ep_enable(struct usb_ep *ep,
> >  	u32 epctrl;
> >  	u32 mps;
> >  	int dir_in;
> > +	int i, val, size;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >
> >  	dev_dbg(hsotg->dev,
> > @@ -2512,17 +2531,8 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_ep_enable(struct usb_ep *ep,
> >  		break;
> >
> >  	case USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_INT:
> > -		if (dir_in) {
> > -			/*
> > -			 * Allocate our TxFNum by simply using the index
> > -			 * of the endpoint for the moment. We could do
> > -			 * something better if the host indicates how
> > -			 * many FIFOs we are expecting to use.
> > -			 */
> > -
> > +		if (dir_in)
> >  			hs_ep->periodic = 1;
> > -			epctrl |= DXEPCTL_TXFNUM(index);
> > -		}
> >
> >  		epctrl |= DXEPCTL_EPTYPE_INTERRUPT;
> >  		break;
> > @@ -2536,8 +2546,25 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_ep_enable(struct usb_ep *ep,
> >  	 * if the hardware has dedicated fifos, we must give each IN EP
> >  	 * a unique tx-fifo even if it is non-periodic.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (dir_in && hsotg->dedicated_fifos)
> > -		epctrl |= DXEPCTL_TXFNUM(index);
> > +	if (dir_in && hsotg->dedicated_fifos) {
> > +		size = hs_ep->ep.maxpacket*hs_ep->mc;
> > +		for (i = 1; i <= 8; ++i) {
> > +			if (hsotg->fifo_map & (1<<i))
> > +				continue;
> > +			val = readl(hsotg->regs + DPTXFSIZN(i));
> > +			val = (val >> FIFOSIZE_DEPTH_SHIFT)*4;
> > +			if (val < size)
> > +				continue;
> > +			hsotg->fifo_map |= 1<<i;
> > +
> > +			epctrl |= DXEPCTL_TXFNUM(i);
> > +			hs_ep->fifo_index = i;
> > +			hs_ep->fifo_size = val;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +		if (i == 8)
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> >
> >  	/* for non control endpoints, set PID to D0 */
> >  	if (index)
> > @@ -2584,6 +2611,9 @@ static int s3c_hsotg_ep_disable(struct usb_ep *ep)
> >  	/* terminate all requests with shutdown */
> >  	kill_all_requests(hsotg, hs_ep, -ESHUTDOWN, false);
> >
> > +	hsotg->fifo_map &= ~(1<<hs_ep->fifo_index);
> > +	hs_ep->fifo_index = 0;
> > +	hs_ep->fifo_size = 0;
> >
> >  	ctrl = readl(hsotg->regs + epctrl_reg);
> >  	ctrl &= ~DXEPCTL_EPENA;
> > @@ -2975,7 +3005,6 @@ static void s3c_hsotg_initep(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg,
> >  				       struct s3c_hsotg_ep *hs_ep,
> >  				       int epnum)
> >  {
> > -	u32 ptxfifo;
> >  	char *dir;
> >
> >  	if (epnum == 0)
> > @@ -3004,15 +3033,6 @@ static void s3c_hsotg_initep(struct s3c_hsotg *hsotg,
> >  	hs_ep->ep.ops = &s3c_hsotg_ep_ops;
> >
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Read the FIFO size for the Periodic TX FIFO, even if we're
> > -	 * an OUT endpoint, we may as well do this if in future the
> > -	 * code is changed to make each endpoint's direction changeable.
> > -	 */
> > -
> > -	ptxfifo = readl(hsotg->regs + DPTXFSIZN(epnum));
> > -	hs_ep->fifo_size = FIFOSIZE_DEPTH_GET(ptxfifo) * 4;
> > -
> > -	/*
> >  	 * if we're using dma, we need to set the next-endpoint pointer
> >  	 * to be something valid.
> >  	 */
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ