[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1450785.beFNo3ByBF@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:18:52 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@...il.com>,
Thomas P Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 09:31:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Cc'ing Thomas,
>
> On 8 July 2014 10:20, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect
> >> solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here
> >> is to not delay other patches just because of that.
> >>
> >> There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody
> >> else was trying to push for that.
> >>
> >> That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead
> >> of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :)
> >
> > Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways
> > I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon.
>
> Hi Mike/Rafael,
>
> Thomas has a dependency on the patch adding "find_siblings()":
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg348080.html
>
> Would it be fine to get this temporary solution (Only within cpufreq-cpu0
> file, so that it doesn't become an API) for now and updating it later once
> bindings are closed?
I don't like that idea, but I wonder what other people think.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists