[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407161754000.23892@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm, tmp: only collapse hugepages to nodes with affinity
for zone_reclaim_mode
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> I wonder if you could do this here?
>
> if (khugepaged_node_load[nid])
> return false;
>
> If the condition is true, it means you already checked the 'nid' node against
> all other nodes present in the pmd in a previous khugepaged_scan_pmd iteration.
> And if it passed then, it would also pass now. If meanwhile a new node was found
> and recorded, it was also checked against everything present at that point,
> including 'nid'. So it should be safe?
>
> The worst case (perfect interleaving page per page, so that "node != last_node"
> is true in each iteration) complexity then reduces from O(HPAGE_PMD_NR *
> MAX_NUMNODES) to O(HPAGE_PMD_NR + MAX_NUMNODES) iterations.
>
Excellent suggestion, thanks Vlastimil!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists