linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] fix freepage count problems due to memory isolation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53C793F0.6030707@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:14:24 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
	t.stanislaws@...sung.com, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Lisa Du <cldu@...vell.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] fix freepage count problems due to memory isolation

On 07/17/2014 08:12 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>
>> Hm I see. So what if it wasn't a special pcplist, but a special "free list"
>> where the pages would be just linked together as on pcplist, regardless of
>> order, and would not merge until the CPU that drives the memory isolation
>> process decides it is safe to flush them away. That would remove the need for
>> IPI's and provide the same guarantees I think.
>
> Looks good. It would work. I think that your solution is better than mine.
> I will implement it and test.

Thanks. But maybe there's still a good use for marking pages specially 
as isolated, and not PageBuddy with freepage_migratetype set to 
MIGRATE_ISOLATE. Why do we buddy-merge them anyway? I don't think CMA or 
memory offlining benefits from that, and it only makes the code more 
complex?
So maybe we could split isolated buddy pages to order-0 marked as 
PageIsolated and have a single per-zone list instead of order-based 
freelists?

>> Do we really need to check PageBuddy()? Could a page get marked as PageIsolate()
>> but still go to normal list instead of isolate list?
>
> Checking PageBuddy() is used for identifying page linked in normal
> list.

Ah right, forgot it walks by pfn scanning, not by traversing the free list.

> Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/