[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140717101413.GR6774@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:14:13 +0200
From: Petr Mládek <pmladek@...e.cz>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...e.de, john.stultz@...aro.org,
jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: honor LOG_PREFIX in devkmsg_read()
On Wed 2014-07-16 12:26:58, Alex Elder wrote:
> In devkmsg_read(), a variable "cont" holds a character that's used
> to indicate whether a given log line is a "continuation", that is,
> whether a log record should be merged with the one before or after
> it. If a record should be merged with its successor (but not its
> predecessor) that character is 'c'. And the line following such a
> 'c' log record is normally marked with a '+' to show it is continues
> its predecessor. Any other cases are marked '-', indicating the
> log record stands on its own.
>
> There is an exception. If a log record is marked LOG_PREFIX, it
> indicates that this record represents a new log entry, implicitly
> terminating the predecessor--even if the predecessor would otherwise
> have been continued. So a record marked LOG_PREFIX (that is not
> also marked LOG_CONT) should have '-' for its "cont" variable.
>
> The logic that determines this "continuation" character has a bug
> that gets that exceptional case wrong.
>
> The specific case that produces the wrong result is when all of
> these conditions are non-zero:
> user->prev & LOG_CONT
> msg->flags & LOG_PREFIX
> msg->flags & LOG_CONT
> The bug is that despite the message's LOG_PREFIX flag, the
> "cont" character is getting set to '+' rather than 'c'.
>
> The problem is that the message's LOG_PREFIX flag is getting
> ignored if its LOG_CONT flag is also set. Rearrange the logic
> here to produce the correct result.
>
> The following table concisely defines the problem:
>
> prev | msg | msg ||"cont"
> CONT |PREFIX| CONT || char
> ------+------+------++------
> clear| clear| clear|| '-'
> clear| clear| set || 'c'
> clear| set | clear|| '-'
> clear| set | set || 'c'
> set | clear| clear|| '+'
> set | set | set || '+'
^^^ typo, it should be:
set | clear | set || '+'
> set | set | clear|| '-'
> set | set | set || '+' <-- should be 'c'
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 301ade3..9e9cf93 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> struct printk_log *msg;
> u64 ts_usec;
> size_t i;
> - char cont = '-';
> + char cont;
> size_t len;
> ssize_t ret;
>
> @@ -619,11 +619,12 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> * better readable output. 'c' in the record flags mark the first
> * fragment of a line, '+' the following.
> */
> - if (msg->flags & LOG_CONT && !(user->prev & LOG_CONT))
> - cont = 'c';
> - else if ((msg->flags & LOG_CONT) ||
> - ((user->prev & LOG_CONT) && !(msg->flags & LOG_PREFIX)))
> + if (user->prev & LOG_CONT && !(msg->flags & LOG_PREFIX))
> cont = '+';
> + else if (msg->flags & LOG_CONT)
> + cont = 'c';
> + else
> + cont = '-';
Makes sense. Prefix should be always on a new line.
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Best Regards,
Petr
> len = sprintf(user->buf, "%u,%llu,%llu,%c;",
> (msg->facility << 3) | msg->level,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists