[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C7BF60.5070800@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 07:19:44 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To: Petr Mládek <pmladek@...e.cz>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...e.de, john.stultz@...aro.org,
jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: honor LOG_PREFIX in devkmsg_read()
On 07/17/2014 05:14 AM, Petr Mládek wrote:
> On Wed 2014-07-16 12:26:58, Alex Elder wrote:
>> In devkmsg_read(), a variable "cont" holds a character that's used
>> to indicate whether a given log line is a "continuation", that is,
>> whether a log record should be merged with the one before or after
>> it. If a record should be merged with its successor (but not its
>> predecessor) that character is 'c'. And the line following such a
>> 'c' log record is normally marked with a '+' to show it is continues
>> its predecessor. Any other cases are marked '-', indicating the
>> log record stands on its own.
>>
>> There is an exception. If a log record is marked LOG_PREFIX, it
>> indicates that this record represents a new log entry, implicitly
>> terminating the predecessor--even if the predecessor would otherwise
>> have been continued. So a record marked LOG_PREFIX (that is not
>> also marked LOG_CONT) should have '-' for its "cont" variable.
>>
>> The logic that determines this "continuation" character has a bug
>> that gets that exceptional case wrong.
>>
>> The specific case that produces the wrong result is when all of
>> these conditions are non-zero:
>> user->prev & LOG_CONT
>> msg->flags & LOG_PREFIX
>> msg->flags & LOG_CONT
>> The bug is that despite the message's LOG_PREFIX flag, the
>> "cont" character is getting set to '+' rather than 'c'.
>>
>> The problem is that the message's LOG_PREFIX flag is getting
>> ignored if its LOG_CONT flag is also set. Rearrange the logic
>> here to produce the correct result.
>>
>> The following table concisely defines the problem:
>>
>> prev | msg | msg ||"cont"
>> CONT |PREFIX| CONT || char
>> ------+------+------++------
>> clear| clear| clear|| '-'
>> clear| clear| set || 'c'
>> clear| set | clear|| '-'
>> clear| set | set || 'c'
>> set | clear| clear|| '+'
>> set | set | set || '+'
> ^^^ typo, it should be:
I will fix this, and it will show up when I re-post the series.
>
> set | clear | set || '+'
>
>> set | set | clear|| '-'
>> set | set | set || '+' <-- should be 'c'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/printk/printk.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
>> index 301ade3..9e9cf93 100644
>> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
>> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
>> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>> struct printk_log *msg;
>> u64 ts_usec;
>> size_t i;
>> - char cont = '-';
>> + char cont;
>> size_t len;
>> ssize_t ret;
>>
>> @@ -619,11 +619,12 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>> * better readable output. 'c' in the record flags mark the first
>> * fragment of a line, '+' the following.
>> */
>> - if (msg->flags & LOG_CONT && !(user->prev & LOG_CONT))
>> - cont = 'c';
>> - else if ((msg->flags & LOG_CONT) ||
>> - ((user->prev & LOG_CONT) && !(msg->flags & LOG_PREFIX)))
>> + if (user->prev & LOG_CONT && !(msg->flags & LOG_PREFIX))
>> cont = '+';
>> + else if (msg->flags & LOG_CONT)
>> + cont = 'c';
>> + else
>> + cont = '-';
>
> Makes sense. Prefix should be always on a new line.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Yay!!! Thanks.
-Alex
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
>
>> len = sprintf(user->buf, "%u,%llu,%llu,%c;",
>> (msg->facility << 3) | msg->level,
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists