[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAComcpPkOM9oy9tYcDqVfF3siKT_RLe54qskhUJRPLWm-MukEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:45:56 -0600
From: Bob Beck <beck@...nbsd.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Bob Beck <beck@...nbsd.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-abi <linux-abi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call
we have diffs pending that will do the syscall method until we start
to see it in libc :)
So basically we're going to put that in right away :)
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:05:01AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
>> Hi Ted, yeah I understand the reasoning, it would be good if there was
>> a way to influence the various libc people to
>> ensure they manage to provide a getentropy().
>
> I don't anticipate that to be a problem. And before they do, and/or
> if you are dealing with a system where the kernel has been upgraded,
> but not libc, you have your choice of either sticking with the
> binary_sysctl approach, or calling getrandom directly using the
> syscall method; and in that case, whether we use getrandom() or
> provide an exact getentropy() replacement system call isn't that much
> difference, since you'd have to have Linux-specific workaround code
> anyway....
>
> - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists