[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C8114D.30601@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:09:17 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
CC: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, teg@...m.no,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Liqin Chen <liqin.linux@...il.com>, msalter@...hat.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
knaack.h@....de, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com, jic23@...nel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Let several drivers depends on HAS_IOMEM for
'devm_ioremap_resource'
Am 17.07.2014 12:48, schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> AFAICT, NO_IOMEM only has a real purpose on UML these days. Could we take
> a shortcut here and make COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML? Getting random stuff
> to build on UML seems pointless to me and we special-case it in a number of
> places already.
If UML is the only arch without io memory the dependency on !UML seems
reasonable to me. :-)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists