linux-kernel - Making the asymmetric keys config option into a top-level option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13161.1405626953@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:55:53 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Subject: Making the asymmetric keys config option into a top-level option

Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com> wrote:

> When ASYMMETRIC_KEYS=y, but depends on CRYPTO=m, selections will be also modules.
> In random config case OID_REGISTRY, MPILIB and ASN1 became modules producing build
> break. This patch removes asymmetric keys dependency from CRYPTO, but instead
> selects CRYPTO and CRYPTO_HASH as they are needed.

You do realise that this makes the asymmetric key config option into a
top-level option?  I think, logically, that's the wrong thing to do.  They
should still appear under the crypto menu.

Note that I think your patch is really the wrong solution.  The right solution
is to fix the configuration tools - but that's quite an undertaking.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/