linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] arch/score/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h: Remove the macros which not be used currently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1407171437270.5185@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>
cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Liqin Chen <liqin.linux@...il.com>,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch/score/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h: Remove the
 macros which not be used currently

On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Lennox Wu wrote:

> Yes, you might miss something. Some patches were merged once I
> acknowledged them,and some were missed.
> So I am not sure the rule, if someone will merge these patches once
> them are acknowledged, it is redundant that I issue a
> PULL request again.
> 

You and Liqin Chen are the listed maintainers for this architecture and 
you do not list a git tree, nobody else is a maintainer for score.  Who 
are you expecting to pick up patches to your architecture?  As maintainer, 
you need to ensure that patches arrive at Linus's tree in one way or 
another, so what is your mechanism for doing so?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/