[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407181656160.3647@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:59:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] (RFC) X86: add IPI tracepoints
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 01:18:55 -0400
> Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
> > index be8e1bde07..e154d176cf 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@
> > #include <asm/apic.h>
> > #include <asm/nmi.h>
> > #include <asm/trace/irq_vectors.h>
> > +
> > +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> > +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
>
> I'm curious to why you added the #undefs. I wouldn't think they were
> needed.
They are needed because asm/trace/irq_vectors.h included prior that
point defines them for itself and that makes the inclusion of
trace/events/ipi.h fail.
> -- Steve
>
> > +#include <trace/events/ipi.h>
> > +
> > /*
> > * Some notes on x86 processor bugs affecting SMP operation:
> > *
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists