[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLsnSujJdZmA=nzHw1_K3eYhSiUEnntJ3S2hCZ8DFVYpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:16:37 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] seccomp: Allow arch code to provide seccomp_data
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> populate_seccomp_data is expensive: it works by inspecting
> task_pt_regs and various other bits to piece together all the
> information, and it's does so in multiple partially redundant steps.
>
> Arch-specific code in the syscall entry path can do much better.
>
> Admittedly this adds a bit of additional room for error, but the
> speedup should be worth it.
I still think we should gain either a note in the
HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER help text in arch/Kconfig, or possibly a new
section in Documentation/prctl/seccomp.txt (or similar) on how do
implement filter support for an architecture, that mentions the
arch-supplied seccomp_data and how two-phase can be done.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists