lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C8E602.1060301@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:16:50 +0800
From:	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pei Feiyue <peifeiyue@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] memory-hotplug: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

Hello,

On 07/18/2014 03:55 PM, Wang Nan wrote:
> This series of patches fix a problem when adding memory in bad manner.
> For example: for a x86_64 machine booted with "mem=400M" and with 2GiB
> memory installed, following commands cause problem:
> 
>  # echo 0x40000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
> [   28.613895] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x40000000-0x47ffffff]
>  # echo 0x48000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
> [   28.693675] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x48000000-0x4fffffff]
>  # echo online_movable > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state
>  # echo 0x50000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe 
> [   29.084090] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x50000000-0x57ffffff]
>  # echo 0x58000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe 
> [   29.151880] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x58000000-0x5fffffff]
>  # echo online_movable > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory11/state
>  # echo online> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory8/state
>  # echo online> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory10/state
>  # echo offline> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state
> [   30.558819] Offlined Pages 32768
>  # free
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:        780588 18014398509432020     830552          0          0      51180
> -/+ buffers/cache: 18014398509380840     881732
> Swap:            0          0          0
> 
> This is because the above commands probe higher memory after online a
> section with online_movable, which causes ZONE_HIGHMEM (or ZONE_NORMAL
> for systems without ZONE_HIGHMEM) overlaps ZONE_MOVABLE.

Yeah, this is rare in reality but can happen. Could you please also
include the free result and zoneinfo after applying your patch?

Thanks.

> 
> After the second online_movable, the problem can be observed from
> zoneinfo:
> 
>  # cat /proc/zoneinfo
> ...
> Node 0, zone  Movable
>   pages free     65491
>         min      250
>         low      312
>         high     375
>         scanned  0
>         spanned  18446744073709518848
>         present  65536
>         managed  65536
> ...
> 
> This series of patches solve the problem by checking ZONE_MOVABLE when
> choosing zone for new memory. If new memory is inside or higher than
> ZONE_MOVABLE, makes it go there instead.
> 
> 
> Wang Nan (5):
>   memory-hotplug: x86_64: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
>   memory-hotplug: x86_32: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
>   memory-hotplug: ia64: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
>   memory-hotplug: sh: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
>   memory-hotplug: powerpc: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
> 
>  arch/ia64/mm/init.c   |  7 +++++++
>  arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c |  6 ++++++
>  arch/sh/mm/init.c     | 13 ++++++++-----
>  arch/x86/mm/init_32.c |  6 ++++++
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 


-- 
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ