[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5659104.6O7AZx76W6@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:55:26 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] nios2: Futex operations
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:42:34 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 18 July 2014 14:07:42 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > If this understanding is right, we can probably just merge the
> > m68k implementation into the asm-generic version, as that does
> > exactly that, and just isn't SMP safe. I'm still unsure whether
> > I'm missing something here though, as everything else seems to
> > do this in assembly, even for non-SMP machines that could use
> > the trivial method that m68k has.
>
> For UP relying of pagefault disable should be good enough indeed. I
> guess the asm for the other UP stuff results from looking at
> architectures or copying from architectures which did this in ASM
Ok, thanks for the confirmation!
Ley Foon Tan, I think the best way forward then is for you to
take the m68k code and copy (or move) that into asm-generic/futex.h
under an #ifndef CONFIG_SMP.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists