linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53C86615.3040107@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:11:01 -0400
From:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask

On 07/17/2014 07:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:30:11PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> This is something similar to what you found yesterday with tick_nohz_full mask.
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>> If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
>> cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
>>
>> Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
>> have_rcu_nocb_mask.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
> 
> Good catch!  Could you please forward-port this to current rcu/dev?
> This now includes the fix you mentioned above, which generates conflicts.
> 
> Could you please also fix the use in rcu_is_nocb_cpu()?
> 
> And please see the comment below.
> 

Please find the fixed patch.

--
Pranith


From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:02:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Feedback comments

If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.

Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
have_rcu_nocb_mask.

Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index ce8c331..8f987c1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2053,9 +2053,10 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 /* Is the specified CPU a no-CBs CPU? */
 bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	if (have_rcu_nocb_mask)
-		return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
-	return false;
+	if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
+		return false;
+
+	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
 }
 #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
 
@@ -2540,7 +2541,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = NULL;  /* Suppress misguided gcc warn. */
 	struct rcu_data *rdp_prev = NULL;
 
-	if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL)
+	if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
 		return;
 #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) && !defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL)
 	if (tick_nohz_full_running)
@@ -2574,9 +2575,9 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 /* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
 static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
-	if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
-	    !cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
+	if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
 		return false;
+
 	rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
 	return true;
 }
-- 
1.9.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/