[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6917971.QKItNU3coA@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:14:55 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jic23@...nel.org,
ch.naveen@...sung.com, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, t.figa@...sung.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, galak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2/4] iio: adc: exynos_adc: Control special clock of ADC to support Exynos3250 ADC
On Friday 18 July 2014 19:00:48 Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 07/18/2014 06:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > Further, why is it called "sclk_adc" rather than just "sclk"?
>
> The sclk means 'special clock' in Exynos TRM. Exynos SoC has varisou sclk clocks.
> 'sclk_adc' is only used for ADC IP.
But that sounds like sclk_adc is the name of the global name
of the clock signal coming out of the clock controller.
I still think it would be best to name it 'sclk' as the input
for the adc. It shouldn't rely on a particular name of the
clock controller.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists