linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 117/170] md: flush writes before starting a recovery.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ff2828f6090b15eefc0b5c747bff20fffdef60f0.1405685481.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:12:02 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 117/170] md: flush writes before starting a recovery.

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 133d4527eab8d199a62eee6bd433f0776842df2e upstream.

When we write to a degraded array which has a bitmap, we
make sure the relevant bit in the bitmap remains set when
the write completes (so a 're-add' can quickly rebuilt a
temporarily-missing device).

If, immediately after such a write starts, we incorporate a spare,
commence recovery, and skip over the region where the write is
happening (because the 'needs recovery' flag isn't set yet),
then that write will not get to the new device.

Once the recovery finishes the new device will be trusted, but will
have incorrect data, leading to possible corruption.

We cannot set the 'needs recovery' flag when we start the write as we
do not know easily if the write will be "degraded" or not.  That
depends on details of the particular raid level and particular write
request.

This patch fixes a corruption issue of long standing and so it
suitable for any -stable kernel.  It applied correctly to 3.0 at
least and will minor editing to earlier kernels.

Reported-by: Bill <billstuff2001@...global.net>
Tested-by: Bill <billstuff2001@...global.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/53A518BB.60709@sbcglobal.net
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index c98e681fc9fc..bf030d4b09a7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -7484,6 +7484,19 @@ void md_do_sync(struct md_thread *thread)
 			    rdev->recovery_offset < j)
 				j = rdev->recovery_offset;
 		rcu_read_unlock();
+
+		/* If there is a bitmap, we need to make sure all
+		 * writes that started before we added a spare
+		 * complete before we start doing a recovery.
+		 * Otherwise the write might complete and (via
+		 * bitmap_endwrite) set a bit in the bitmap after the
+		 * recovery has checked that bit and skipped that
+		 * region.
+		 */
+		if (mddev->bitmap) {
+			mddev->pers->quiesce(mddev, 1);
+			mddev->pers->quiesce(mddev, 0);
+		}
 	}

 	printk(KERN_INFO "md: %s of RAID array %s\n", desc, mdname(mddev));
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/