[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1407181339510.15709@namei.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:41:07 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-firmware@...nel.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] firmware_class: perform new LSM checks
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, Kees Cook wrote:
> This attaches LSM hooks to the existing firmware loading interfaces:
> filesystem-found firmware and demand-loaded blobs.
> static int fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct device *device,
> @@ -640,6 +646,12 @@ static ssize_t firmware_loading_store(struct device *dev,
> break;
> case 0:
> if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_LOADING, &fw_buf->status)) {
> + if (security_kernel_fw_from_file(NULL, fw_buf->data,
> + fw_buf->size)) {
> + fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &fw_buf->status);
> clear_bit(FW_STATUS_LOADING, &fw_buf->status);
>
>
Can you explain the loading store, and what the semantics are for an LSM
when a NULL is passed as the file?
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists