linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Remove --file option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:37:54 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com, tytso@....edu,
	dwalter@...gle.com, neilb@...e.de, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Remove --file option

On 07/18/2014 01:23 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:29:37AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> First, 'abuse' is a relative term. It describes a use you
>> (and possibly many others) may find objectionable, but that
>> does not mean all uses are objectionable.
>
> Do you actually have a valid use case for keeping the cmdline switch ...
>

I find it convenient to be able to check a new file before committing it
and creating a patch. Also, I find it convenient to be able use it to clean
up a file before I do heavy lifting with it. Yes, I understand the latter
is discouraged nowadays, and I would not use it anymore outside my scope
of responsibility unless specifically asked by the maintainer to do so,
but in such cases it helps me a lot to be able to address the cleanup
prior to the heavy lifting.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/