[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1407180922110.28503@gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:23:24 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
cc: rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] doc: Add remote CPU access details and others to
this_cpu_ops.txt
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> > then we have on x86 a increment operation with locked semantics racing
> > with an unlocked one on the same cacheline.
> OK, I will add this as a warning in the documentation. Thanks!
Note that I have not been able to get beyond a bad feeling. Looked up
various sources of information about how the lock prefix works. Still I am
not sure if this works or not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists