[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1405695433.14358.40.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 07:57:13 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
apw@...onical.com, tytso@....edu, dwalter@...gle.com,
neilb@...e.de, hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Remove --file option
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:49 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 07:35:26AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Using the one-liner above also makes it harder to
> > automate checkpatch neatening and avoid using Lindent:
>
> automated checkpatch?? More idiocy... we want less, in case you've
> forgotten.
"we" is a subset of "all of us".
> <snip more pointless justification attempts>
Those are not at all pointless if you intend to fix
any issue found by the tool.
I think your viewpoint is a bit tainted as you're the
same guy that wrote "fuck readability".
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/19/116
> It is about time people understood that and dropped the senseless frenzy
> of creating patches with less time spent on thinking about them than
> preparing them.
I suggest you try writing some documentation
patches instead of acrid emails.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists