[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1405697232-11785-18-git-send-email-benoit.taine@lip6.fr>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:27:04 +0200
From: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@...6.fr>
To: Joshua Morris <josh.h.morris@...ibm.com>
Cc: benoit.taine@...6.fr, Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/25] block: Replace DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use
We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@...6.fr>
---
Tested by compilation without errors.
drivers/block/rsxx/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
index a8de2ee..820b400 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ static const struct pci_error_handlers rsxx_err_handler = {
.slot_reset = rsxx_slot_reset,
};
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rsxx_pci_ids) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id rsxx_pci_ids[] = {
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_FS70_FLASH)},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_IBM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_FS80_FLASH)},
{0,},
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists