lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1405657206-12060-12-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2014 21:20:01 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 11/16] bpf: allow eBPF programs to use maps

expose bpf_map_lookup_elem(), bpf_map_update_elem(), bpf_map_delete_elem()
map accessors to eBPF programs

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h      |    5 +++
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |    3 ++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c     |   85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index b5e90efddfcf..a7566afbe23b 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -128,4 +128,9 @@ struct sk_filter *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd);
 /* verify correctness of eBPF program */
 int bpf_check(struct sk_filter *fp);
 
+/* in-kernel helper functions called from eBPF programs */
+u64 bpf_map_lookup_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
+u64 bpf_map_update_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
+u64 bpf_map_delete_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 3f288e1d08f1..06e0f63055fb 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -377,6 +377,9 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
  */
 enum bpf_func_id {
 	BPF_FUNC_unspec,
+	BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem, /* void *map_lookup_elem(map_id, void *key) */
+	BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem, /* int map_update_elem(map_id, void *key, void *value) */
+	BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem, /* int map_delete_elem(map_id, void *key) */
 	__BPF_FUNC_MAX_ID,
 };
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 9d441f17548e..2d6e6a171594 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -741,3 +741,88 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(bpf, int, cmd, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 }
+
+/* called from eBPF program under rcu lock
+ *
+ * if kernel subsystem is allowing eBPF programs to call this function,
+ * inside its own verifier_ops->get_func_proto() callback it should return
+ * (struct bpf_func_proto) {
+ *    .ret_type = PTR_TO_MAP_CONDITIONAL,
+ *    .arg1_type = CONST_ARG_MAP_ID,
+ *    .arg2_type = PTR_TO_STACK_IMM_MAP_KEY,
+ * }
+ * so that eBPF verifier properly checks the arguments
+ */
+u64 bpf_map_lookup_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+{
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	int map_id = r1;
+	void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2;
+	void *value;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+	map = idr_find(&bpf_map_id_idr, map_id);
+	/* eBPF verifier guarantees that map_id is valid for the life of
+	 * the program
+	 */
+	BUG_ON(!map);
+
+	value = map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
+
+	return (unsigned long) value;
+}
+
+/* called from eBPF program under rcu lock
+ *
+ * if kernel subsystem is allowing eBPF programs to call this function,
+ * inside its own verifier_ops->get_func_proto() callback it should return
+ * (struct bpf_func_proto) {
+ *    .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ *    .arg1_type = CONST_ARG_MAP_ID,
+ *    .arg2_type = PTR_TO_STACK_IMM_MAP_KEY,
+ *    .arg3_type = PTR_TO_STACK_IMM_MAP_VALUE,
+ * }
+ * so that eBPF verifier properly checks the arguments
+ */
+u64 bpf_map_update_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+{
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	int map_id = r1;
+	void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2;
+	void *value = (void *) (unsigned long) r3;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+	map = idr_find(&bpf_map_id_idr, map_id);
+	/* eBPF verifier guarantees that map_id is valid */
+	BUG_ON(!map);
+
+	return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value);
+}
+
+/* called from eBPF program under rcu lock
+ *
+ * if kernel subsystem is allowing eBPF programs to call this function,
+ * inside its own verifier_ops->get_func_proto() callback it should return
+ * (struct bpf_func_proto) {
+ *    .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ *    .arg1_type = CONST_ARG_MAP_ID,
+ *    .arg2_type = PTR_TO_STACK_IMM_MAP_KEY,
+ * }
+ * so that eBPF verifier properly checks the arguments
+ */
+u64 bpf_map_delete_elem(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+{
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	int map_id = r1;
+	void *key = (void *) (unsigned long) r2;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+
+	map = idr_find(&bpf_map_id_idr, map_id);
+	/* eBPF verifier guarantees that map_id is valid */
+	BUG_ON(!map);
+
+	return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
+}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ