[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1405697232-11785-1-git-send-email-benoit.taine@lip6.fr>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:26:47 +0200
From: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@...6.fr>
To: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benoit.taine@...6.fr, ath5k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net,
ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net, linux-hippi@...site.dk,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-acenic@...site.dk,
wil6210@....qualcomm.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, users@...x00.serialmonkey.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
industrypack-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...gotech.com,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 0/25] Replace DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use
We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over
`DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines.
This issue was reported by checkpatch.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/):
// <smpl>
@@
identifier i;
declarer name DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE;
initializer z;
@@
- DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(i)
+ const struct pci_device_id i[]
= z;
// </smpl>
I have 103 patches ready, and will only send a few for you to judge if
it is useful enough, and to prevent from spamming too much.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists