[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140718162213.GC31114@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:22:13 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@...6.fr>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net,
ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net, linux-hippi@...site.dk,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-acenic@...site.dk,
wil6210@....qualcomm.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, users@...x00.serialmonkey.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
industrypack-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...gotech.com,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/25] Replace DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
> We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over
> `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines.
> This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Honestly, I prefer the macro -- it stands-out more. Maybe the style
guidelines and/or checkpatch should change instead?
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists