[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4QF0-2e=ZDFvZkjRGunNaqSZ98D2Ah50bUqdgGcDXaPnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:31:26 +0200
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Ryan Lortie <desrt@...rt.ca>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] selftests: add memfd_create() + sealing tests
Hi
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, David Herrmann wrote:
>
>> Some basic tests to verify sealing on memfds works as expected and
>> guarantees the advertised semantics.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
>
> Thanks for whatever the fix was, I didn't hit any problem running
> this version repeatedly, on 64-bit and on 32-bit.
glibc does pid-caching so getpid() can be skipped once called. fork()
and clone() have to update it, though. Therefore, you shouldn't mix
fork() and clone() in the same process. I replaced my fork() call with
a simple clone() and the bug was gone.
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists