linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre/lustre/lov: Remove unneeded 'if' statement in lov_request.c/lov_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2014 21:34:56 +0200
From:	Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucchese@...il.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	oleg.drokin@...el.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucchese@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre/lustre/lov: Remove unneeded 'if' statement in lov_request.c/lov_check_set()

It is silly to go through an if statement to set a single boolean
value in function of a single boolean expression. In the function
lov_check_set, assign the return value directly.

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Lucchese <riccardo.lucchese@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
index ce830e4..90fc66a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c
@@ -140,14 +140,13 @@ void lov_set_add_req(struct lov_request *req, struct lov_request_set *set)
 
 static int lov_check_set(struct lov_obd *lov, int idx)
 {
-	int rc = 0;
+	int rc;
 	mutex_lock(&lov->lov_lock);
 
-	if (lov->lov_tgts[idx] == NULL ||
-	    lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_active ||
-	    (lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp != NULL &&
-	     class_exp2cliimp(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried))
-		rc = 1;
+	rc = lov->lov_tgts[idx] == NULL ||
+		lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_active ||
+		(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp != NULL &&
+		 class_exp2cliimp(lov->lov_tgts[idx]->ltd_exp)->imp_connect_tried);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&lov->lov_lock);
 	return rc;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/